this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
152 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19096 readers
4634 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump won Dearborn and made significant gains in Hamtramck due to anger among Arab American and Muslim communities over deaths in Gaza, Lebanon, and Yemen.

Trump received 42.48% of the vote in Dearborn and 42.7% in Hamtramck, compared to 36.26% and 46.2% for Vice President Kamala Harris, respectively.

Despite Trump’s victory in Dearborn, the Republican nominee for U.S. Senator lost to the Democratic nominee.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io -4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Harris's campaign sucked even in the eyes of me, a non-American who doesn't keep up with the nitty gritty of American politics. She had a massive headstart (remember the first while after her nomination? She was basically a messiah for democrats) and managed to lose it with her wishy washy attitude and right wing policies.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In another thread you were commenting how much you liked that Shitface won, and now you want people to convince that you don't care about US politics but hoped Harris would've been a better candidate, without ever saying anything specific?

[–] RandomGen1@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I gave their profile a cursory look, but I couldn't find this in the few handfuls of posts I looked at. Do you have a link to a comment or two showing this, maybe I missed it?

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can you not put words in my mouth? I'm hoping for some sweet karma against Harris for messing up the Democrat campaign so hard and causing four more years of Trump.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Blaming Harris for that is just idiotic and I don't believe you arguing in good faith when you say this shit.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean believe whatever you want then I guess. If you can't believe that her promise to build a border wall didn't sit well with democrat voters, that's on you.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And what do you think Trump is going to do? Enjoy your concentration camps & fascism while the world freefalls into a climate collapse.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I literally never said anything that implies I'm happy about Trump's election why do you insist that I'm secretly a Trumper? Is it that hard to believe that someone can criticize Harris without being a Trump supporter?

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because it's a two party system there. You either get Trump, or you get Harris. So running around and arguing that potential Harris voters didn't vote for her because she (according to you) may does very lightweight variants of what Trump would do 500x times worse, is just bullshit. You don't like Harris supporting Israel, so you vote for Trump? What do you think Trump will do? The guy asked if they can't just nuke the entire middle east. So if you don't want Trump, you would've had to vote for Harris. Anything else would be in support of Trump. That's how it works in the US.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's how it works in the US.

I mean yes, and enough people didn't know that or, more likely, just didn't care. Voters' default state is staying at home; they need to be pushed to go to the polls. Harris failed at that. Whatever the reasons may be, I still don't understand why you're blaming me for it. I'm not even American what do you expect me to do here?

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Harris didn't fail at that. It's the voters / non voters fault.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No matter whose fault it was, it was Harris and her campaign managers' job to make sure this doesn't happen. Blaming the voters is about as productive as yelling about your controller being broken. Or will it sound better if it's Bernie saying it?

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

It's the voters responsibility to vote and to make an informed decision. Or to formulate it differently: You get what you vote for. And your analogy makes no sense either, unless you're saying voters are controlled little drones that can't do anything without user input.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

Since I responded to your other claim earlier, here I'll just say this:

I never said I didn't care about US politics. I said I don't keep up with the nitty gritty, meaning the details of the policies being discussed. For example, I knew that Harris was adopting a right wing stance on immigration, but only today found out she had promised to build a border wall.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

right wing policies.

Like what?

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago
  • Completely adopting the right-wing framing on immigration. Ended up running in favor of the most right-wing and damaging immigration bill. (She adopted it because Trump rejected the bill because he wanted to run on it.)

  • Signing on to continue Trump's stupid border wall.

  • Adopting a policy on Gaza that was as favorable to Israel as any official policy of the Republicans.

  • Not challenging state-level laws against trans people, largely taking a state's right position on the matter.

  • Seeking out and running on endorsements from Dick Cheney and other prominent Republicans.

  • Embracing fracking when fracking isn't even supported by a majority of Pennsylvanians.

  • Completely abandoning medicare for all, not even making the public option a major part of her campaign.