this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
87 points (96.8% liked)

World News

39019 readers
2680 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen suggesting replacing Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) with U.S. exports in a phone conversation with U.S. President-elect Donald Trump on Nov. 8.

Von der Leyen spoke with Trump three days after his victory in the Nov. 5 presidential election.

Replacing Europe's supplies of Russian LNG was "one of the topics" the two leaders discussed, von der Leyen told reporters in Budapest.

. . .

The European Union imposed its first major restrictions on Russian gas, including LNG, in its 14th sanctions package in June. Russia still remains Europe's second-largest importer of LNG, after the U.S.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 48 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Good move. But a better move would be to reduce reliance on LNG all together.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 days ago

We do that in parallel just takes time.

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 10 points 6 days ago

You can work on both at the same time, but you can't abandon gas from one to the other second

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

You're talking about a pro-fossil fuel, anti-climate change administration.

I'm only surprised this is something negative for Putin.

[–] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I find super funny that they tried to impose sanctions to something we are 100% depending on. And instead of, you know, fixing the problem of dependency, they'll switch to a different dealer.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 13 points 6 days ago

The dependency was massively reduced just in 2022 post invasion, but you can't just go cold turkey.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago

There are multiple sources for it and they only sanction one of them.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

We didn't really stop importing Russian gas, there's still long-term contracts if e.g. Austria refused to accept Russian gas they'd still have to pay for it. Situation is different with Germany as there Russia broke the contract, stopped deliveries even though Germany was paying, so the country got out of the long-term contract for free.

When it comes to self-sanctioning have a look at Russia sanctioning European food exports. Not that the Faroese would ever complain, of course, they're selling tons of fish to Russia right now who can blame them their yearly GDP is like three patriot batteries.