Technology

59429 readers

2632 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

133

AI-generated poetry is indistinguishable from human-written poetry and is rated more favorably - Scientific Reports (www.nature.com)

submitted 12 hours ago by arrakark@10291998.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world

63 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It doesn't appeal to the masses.

Most people don't "get" poetry. That's why you don't see many people sitting around reading books of poetry.

Many people would probably also choose a short story written by AI over one written by a professional author.

Heck, I'm sure comments written by AI generally get more upvotes than comments written by humans.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Most people don't "get" poetry.

Did you channel your edgy 15 year old self for that? That's incredibly arrogant and self absorbed.

[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

It's simply the truth. Go around and ask 20 people if they've read a single piece of poetry in the last year, and you'll see what I'm talking about.

It's not even being edgy. Most people don't get high concept art in general, and there's nothing wrong about it. I certainly don't understand classical dance, or abstract paintings. You need some degree of competence in any art form to truly appreciate it. To think otherwise is incredibly arrogant.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Or, there simply isn't anything to "get".

Art is often enough deliberately made in such a way that you can't know what was meant, without knowing beforehand what the artist meant. Framing that as some form of sophistication is simply delusional gatekeeping. It's the attempt to set the own class apart, nothing more.

These are memes. Symbols that only make sense, if you know the reference. Treating these as indicators for anything is just an attempt to create an in-group.

[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think it's worth it to argue with a person of such worldview. Maybe someone with more patience than me will reply.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 3 points 6 hours ago

So you're out of arguments and resort to ad hominem?

Well, that's not very poetic of you.