this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
730 points (99.1% liked)

Linux

5288 readers
272 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The petition is open to all EU resident. The goal is to replace all Windows in all public institution in Europe with a sovereign GNU/Linux.

If the petition is successful it would be a huge step forward for GNU/Linux adoption.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bustAsh@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago (4 children)

My main worry with Linux becoming more popular is that it will be attacked with more malware and viruses. I wouldn't mind though if Linux programmers could come up with better protection.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Linux is a lot easier to secure

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Most of the Windows malware gets deployed by some user downloading and executing random files they downloaded on the web. Since installing applications on Linux is usually done through some centralized package manager or app store (Flathub), it almost entirely eliminates this attack vector. Running random scripts from the internet by downloading them using curl and piping them into sudo bash is a whole nother issue though. Noob-friendly distros like Ubuntu should IMO have some safeguards in place to block these actions.

[–] pixelscript@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Since installing applications on Linux is usually done through some centralized package manager or app store (Flathub), it almost entirely eliminates this attack vector.

xz moment.

Yes, I see that weasel word "almost" in that sentence. I expect it's going to be doing increasingly heavy lifting as Linux becomes a more lucrative target to attack over time.

Your point generally stands, though. Even if they're fallible, at least someone is vetting it at all somewhere in this pipeline.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

They have, snaps

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 50 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Linux is already what a decent chunk of servers run, so I don't really see it increasing malware.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The insecure parts of Linux is mostly on the DE side opposed to the core OS part that servers use. We absolutely will see more vulnerabilities in the future as Linux grows.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

What vulnerabilities are you talking about? Linux is pretty solid especially with wayland and flatpaks.

Throw in some other tools like mandatory access controls and you are set

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Many developments over the last few years have been for improving those aspects, e.g. Wayland is far more secure than X11 could ever be. There will be more vulnerabilities found, but it won't be as bad as one might fear.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Flatpak too, they could force more filesystem restrictions tho, line Android apps

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well, servers don't generally run Thunderbird and Firefox

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Linux-based OSes are less uniform than Windows. They could and probably will be targeted, but exploits won't spread because of how many verities they are and how different and incompatible they can be. Some, for example, don't even use the GNU utils and userland.

[–] pound_heap@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

This petition is for developing something dubbed "EU-Linux", so if implemented as is will be pretty uniform

[–] gens@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago

That is mostly false. Most of the code that faces the network is the same. As is most of the background running code. Linux is still more secure.