memes

10447 readers

3606 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civil

No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politics

This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent reposts

Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No bots

No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads

No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

!tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
!linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
!comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world

The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website

656

Probably the easiest boycott you could do, let's do it Lemmy! (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 days ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world

614 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I for one have stopped posting any content to lemmy.ml communities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I agree that it's the Democrats' fault that they lost, but I stand by the assertion that people who would rather not vote at all than vote for the lesser of two evils are partially to blame when the greater of two evils wins.

I didn't say they wanted a Trump presidency, I said they didn't want a Harris presidency. I only congratulated them on their efforts to prevent that.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The people saying "Genocide, punishing immigrants, tough-on-crime rhetoric, and complicated, means-tested bullshit decreases your bases turnout" are not at fault for those unpopular policies decreasing turnout. Everyone who failed to publicly criticize the dems so they could maintain the delusion they could win while promising to do the opposite of what the people whose votes they depend on want are far more culpable.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

No, the people who decided not to vote because the better candidate wasn't better enough are to blame

[–] aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee 7 points 3 days ago

I can agree both those things happened, but you're saying one of them had a much stronger effect and so far i'm not seeing any evidence presented