Comic Strips

12766 readers

2805 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
The comic must be a complete story.
If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
You may post comics from others or your own.
If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
Politeness.
Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.

Web of links

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
!memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

lawrence@lemmy.world

1102

I'm not locked in here with you, you're locked in here with me! (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 3 days ago by blah_blah_blah@sh.itjust.works to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world

140 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Artist: @gryzlock_comics

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But still not answered the question.

I'll reword it for you, since you want to be pedantic about it.

You're in the process of seizing the means. They see this and don't like it. They respond with overwhelming violence (as they have repeatedly in the past)

Now what?

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If peacefully unionizing or organizing folk are attacked, they are morally free to defend themselves, even in an organized way.

Establishing killsquads and public executions will not stay "pure" and will cause massive spill over violence.

There's an important distinction between the two.

Above I provided a meaningful reply to "what's your solution". You can argue it might not be effective, but I'm certainly not avoiding anything. I made my point, and my suggestion.

[–] Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

I was just trying to show that taking the high road effectively does nothing, when the opposition is willing to stoop to any level to win.

And that, historically, whether we are non-violent or violent, both have been countered with violence.

You're absolutely right about the spillover violence, but I would contend that we're currently experiencing that anyway, as inequality runs rampant and people are forced to crime to survive.

We've been trying the peaceful way for my entire lifetime and made no real progress. Perhaps it's time for a different approach. I'm not really comfortable with it morally, but I'm also not morally comfortable with things staying the way they are for another generation.