IPv6 mutli-GB jumbo frames? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago by fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works to c/ipv6@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Has anyone messed with using the very large jumbo frames for IPv6 for anything like video transfer, or large file transfers?

I'm curious if anyone has done it for firewall overhead reduction too

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] orangeboats@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Multi-GB jumbo frames? At that point you'd hit ethernet limitations rather than IP ones.

permalink
fedilink
source
hideshow 2 child comments

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

True, but should still see a reduction in layer 3 fire walling overhead, no? Though at that point I see places where annoying issues could start occurring.

permalink
fedilink
source
parent

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023

4 points (100.0% liked)

IPv6

316 readers

3 users here now

IPv6 Discussions

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

apearson@lemmy.world

unquietwiki@programming.dev