this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
983 points (98.6% liked)

memes

10666 readers
1652 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

Money is literally an "I owe you"

When money was first used, instead of exchanging an apple for an orange, X amount of apples is exchanged for a dollar. The dollar is the buyer saying "I owe you" to the seller.

When the apple seller now use the dollar on something else, that's just selling the "I owe you" in exchange for something else.

Spending money is just selling debt.

(At least that's how money has always worked in my mind. Listen, economy is weird, idk how this shit works, I'm just coming up with my own explanation okay.)

[–] iii@mander.xyz 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Historically, debt existed before money existed. But that only works in a framework where people can trust eachother to repay the debt.

[–] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Debt: The First 5000 Years by David Graeber is a cool book about this whole topic

[–] iii@mander.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I also liked Economics of Money and Banking, a course by Prof. Mehrilng of columbio university, which is available through coursera (1).

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 13 points 2 weeks ago

It's not the buyer saying "I owe you", but the issuer of the currency (actually, usually just the notes, coins are considered to have value). The first person/entity to get the note gave, or promised, the issuer (usually the central bank) something of value, and the issuer gave them a token (note) saying the bank owes the holder of that note a certain amount of value. The recipient can then trade that note freely, as can future recipients, in the knowledge a vendor will accept it for its face value. So, yes, you're trading debt when you use money, but it's the bank's debt to the holder, not the debt of the buyer.

Typically the bank issue money when someone takes a loan, i.e. promises that they will pay the bank the value of the loan plus interest.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I have a bunch of letters from my family dating back to the civil war. It's fascinating how many IOUs there are in there for like a bushel of apples, or a scrap of leather, or whatever they traded to their neighbors. Like you said, scraps of paper with IOU were literally used like currency, but the real currency was people's reputation to make good on their debts, the paper was just to track it.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Bartering also assumes, for your example, that the apple farmer wants oranges and the orange farmer wants apples. Consider that either one may not. And then consider how many other goods exist even in primitive agrarian society that people may or may not want at any given time.

Currency is whatever the agreed vehicle is for value exchange that solves this. The apple farmer can now sell apples for silver nuggets and use the silver to buy tools from someone else later, which the orange farmer either doesn't have or is unwilling to part with. It allows for more complex transactions that then helped grow more complex societies.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No, you're right! This is exactly why adjusting interest rates by the bank issuing a currency affects how much money is in circulation.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

I get why you see it as that but the big thing is that when you have money you basically did something to earn it. You get it after the fact. Well except for the issuer. Debt changes that where you get it ahead of time. Curiously this has been used by the issuer in modern times to determine how much to issue.