memes

10645 readers

3168 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civil

No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politics

This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent reposts

Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No bots

No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads

No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

688

submitted 1 week ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world

155 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The reason I believe sequels are doing good is:

movie theaters have been perverted into massive and expensive hype fests
in strong opposition, past movie theaters were not expensive to go to and got you entertained in a social setting
due to the rise of large chains, small and cheaper theaters have died out.
assumption: the price to rent a movie for your theater will probably be horrendous by now
sequels have kind of a known quality which lowers the hurdle
that means new movies could be watched in smaller theaters and would have to be sustainable for those

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

There used to be dozens of theaters in a city, each one with a different set of contracts playing a different set of movies. Nowadays there are hundreds of movies in a city, all of them with the same set of contracts playing the same 5 movies.
Yes, everything is too expensive, what means nobody can afford to take a risk. Not the public, not the theaters, not the studios. (You can see people on this thread commenting that they won't.)
There are what? 3 movie studios nowadays? Or are those 2? Either way, you can't expect diversity from that.