195

4171 readers

1 users here now

RULE 1: IF YOU VISIT THIS COMMUNITY, YOU MUST POST BEFORE LEAVING!!

The Lemmy equivalent of r/195 on Reddit. Not officially affiliated (yet).
Any moderators from the reddit can have mod here, just ask.
There's another 196 over on 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone Most people use the Blahaj.zone one so this place isn't very active. ALL HAIL LORD SPRONKUS!!!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

moss@lemmy.world

sylveon@lemmy.world

Akhuyan@lemmy.world

110

coming here was a trap, but I shall oblige (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/196@lemmy.world

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Here is the source of your error" (points to a template definition 15 levels deep in the standard library)

[–] Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"error on line" (points to syntactically perfectly fine line of code until you realize, that you forgot to add the semicolon after your macro on the previous line)

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Although that's gotten better in recent years, as I recall.

[–] Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah, think so too. at least with some standard library stuff.

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Isn't that mostly a matter for the compiler?

[–] Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, but I'm not sure how good the compiler is with arbitrary macros as opposed to the stdlib ones.