CPUSA has said they are unwilling to vanguard on there own website, called the PRC a naiton with 9 parties in congress a 1 party state and has implied that AES is not democratic in a few of there publications

lets also add to this that EVERY ELECTION they just suport the dems, no calls to withold votes, no trying to run a canidate of there own that while it may be bad electoraly would be able to show that not everyone suports the dems

they eject the only 2 chapters that opposed Isn'treal and invited an speaker from Isreal that spoke in favor of zionism to one of there confrences

they are either woefully incompetent, or they are controlled oposition, or both

[–] SovietReporter@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can you please add the sources for these? I would love to have them.

[–] Makan@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 months ago

None of that is true. The CPUSA members know that the PRC is a nation with multiple parties and have said so. Never has it implied that AES is not democratic, judging by their works on Cuba and Laos and Vietnam. Also, in most elections, they don’t support the Dems and even had a schism over support of Democrats. They’ve run multiple candidates throughout the country recently.

Also, the whole organization opposes Israel and they ejected those two chapters because they were doxxing people, including a friend of mine, and the speaker was a communist who couldn’t say much about his actual politics who was later ejected from the Knesset.

They are not incompetent or controlled opposition. We’ve had several gains under Joe Sims compared to John Bachtell, such as the Amazon Workers Union.

^ This is my reply to the other person.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (9 replies)