SovietReporter

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
 
 
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/6974021

The president's executive order also cuts future funding to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, which provides aid to Palestinians.

 

The president's executive order also cuts future funding to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, which provides aid to Palestinians.

[–] SovietReporter@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Maybe you can create a blog with images and then archive the blog?

 
[–] SovietReporter@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Still wrong, but less atrocious

 

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/6837696

This graph is important

It’s based on the writings of professor Cheng Enfu, President of the Academy of Marxism at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) and Director of the Academic Division of Marxist Studies of CASS.

Socialism and communism are not one and done processes. They are gradual changes, both Marx and Lenin have addressed this extensively. We can’t just instantly press the big communism button unfortunately.

Here’s a paper that goes way more in depth on the professor’s definitions: https://guilfordjournals.com/doi/pdf/10.1521/siso.2022.86.2.159

Archive

[–] SovietReporter@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Their definition of peace is that there is nobody else in the other side left to oppose them.

[–] SovietReporter@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This is on the App Store today

#1 in social media

[–] SovietReporter@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which are some of the unhinged things they have said?

[–] SovietReporter@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Doesn’t it sound just like pure paranoia from China? The Soviets growing their sphere of influence just meant more socialist countries. Did the Soviets ever just conquer countries and force them to adapt their system as China feared?

After reading everything that you wrote. To me this just sounded as erratic behavior which caused that instead of having more socialist countries with a Soviet-like system, we now have a world of capitalist countries with USA like system.

China wanted to prevent an influential country to have sway in its region yet, now they have practically no socialist countries in the region. And of those, the second biggest one, Vietnam, doesn’t seem to like China.

I cannot stop, but think that China’s behavior on this sabotaged the spread of socialism in Asia and achieved the total opposite of what they wanted. They now have another country, which is far far worse, being very influential in the region, USA.

[–] SovietReporter@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

How did you calculate it?

[–] SovietReporter@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 month ago

What surprises me is Vietnam not accepting

[–] SovietReporter@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wow, I didn't know that being in a communist party was such a big time and energy commitment.

[–] SovietReporter@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What do you mean? In which way?

[–] SovietReporter@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can you please add the sources for these? I would love to have them.

view more: next ›