this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
267 points (90.6% liked)

196

16710 readers
2381 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] franklin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've never seen it's a particularly bad example I assume?

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fury Road was a Mad Max film that came out a few years ago. It was a great movie, not only for the story, but also for the effects. Its scale was massive.

In the months and years immediately following Fury Road, it was heralded as a turning point in cinema that rejected CGI in favor of practical effects. It was cast as a rejection of CGI and a return to classic practical effects. In recent years, however, we've started to reject that narrative. If you watch the movie closely, you realize it is chock-full of CGI. We just never noticed because it was done so well, and the way it was effortlessly folded into practical elements made the CGI extremely immersive. I think the lesson we all learned was that CGI, when complemented with seamless practical effects, makes for a killer visual experience.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

happy 25th anniversary to the playstation 2