26
Intentionally corrupting LLM training data?
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
26 points (78.3% liked)
Programming
17326 readers
239 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Re: CSS and Javascript being obvious - I'm planning to do this entirely server side, since I control the whole stack.
Regular users (and good bots) get regular pages, but if a
GPTBotuser agent makes a request, they just get garbage back. (Obviously this relies on OpenAI not masking the user agent, but if they do that, hopefully bigger webmasters will notice the lack of hits and call them out.)I like your idea with the sentence fragments. Because the LLM check would happen before I actually look up the requested resource, I think I could combine it with fake links to lead the scraper on a wild goose chase.
Yeah, that all makes sense. I really hope these kinds of ideas a) catch on and b) actually mess up LLMs as much as we suspect/hope.