this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
73 points (84.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5289 readers
538 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
73
Should Climate Protesters Be Less Annoying? (newrepublic.com)
submitted 1 year ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
118 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Archived copy

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] andymouse@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actually, it pushes the envelope. People making sacrifices makes the best kind of point to other people.

The Arab spring comes to mind.

Was that man also an idiot who didn't inspire anything?

At some point, the spark will catch.

[–] loom_in_essence@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It depends on the protest. You can't just do a random thing and expect people to get inspired. Gluing yourself to something makes you look foolish. Not inspiring. Blocking traffic is actually related to the problem, so it can start a spark.

Some of the best environmentist protestors are the ones who chain themselves to trees to stop old growth logging. These are excellent and passionate protests.

The glue and paintings nonsense works against this. It's stupid and distracting and discouraging.

[–] andymouse@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, and how is turning yourself ON FIRE related to a constructive solution to the problems in the Middle East?

I hear your point but I'm not buying it. Sounds like fear to me. I think people should do ALL KINDS of shit EVERYWHERE. Not fit themselves into some kind of rational frame of "what makes sense".

I'd guess it's not what "makes sense" that sparks revolutions, it's the real crazy stuff.

[–] loom_in_essence@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Setting yourself on fire is an ultimate and devastating personal sacrifice, not a bratty lashing out at random stuff. No comparison. However, once you set yourself on fire you can't help anybody anymore, ever, so it's still a bad idea.

Gluing yourself to things has proven to be a failed strategy. Everybody just makes fun of you. It's humiliating and does a disservice to actual activists.