this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
384 points (98.0% liked)

RetroGaming

19903 readers
506 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This was printed in Playboy magazine in April 2001.

It's hard to explain to people who weren't around back then how loose the "rules" were for making games. Conker's Bad Fur Day was definitely trying to market itself as edgy, but aside from some faith-based groups who would be upset, nobody really cared.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Vytle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Conker's Bad Fur Day is not a Nintendo game.

[โ€“] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Okay Princess Pedantic.

It wasnt made by nintendo (even though you could argue that Rare, being funded by nintendo, could be loosely considered as under the umbrella until it was sold to Microsoft)

but it was on nintendo64

Still making it a Nintendo game to anyone who doesnt huff farts.