this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
743 points (94.4% liked)

linuxmemes

21748 readers
1593 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
    •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    743
    We need the game publishers to face more consequences for neglecting a significant segment of the market (lemmy.ca)
    submitted 1 day ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    119 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

    Why is this the hot take? Have we not learned from Cloud strike?

    The current "anticheat" is literally just the malware industry. Companies develop a anticheat and then the cheaters develop something to break it. The longer this goes on the more invasive the anticheat gets. It is a losing situation where the end user loses.

    [–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

    Can't we just have machine learning models running server side to detect cheaters or something? Why do they need to be so invasive

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

    It feels like a chicken and egg problem for sure. I firmly believe that people should be able to cheat all they want. Trying to stop cheating just creates more incentives.

    [–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

    Then online games would be unplayable. It's not a chicken and egg problem, pretty sure cheaters came first.