this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
269 points (99.6% liked)

World News

39691 readers
4347 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

In 2024, global temperatures rose 1.6°C above preindustrial levels, surpassing the 1.5°C Paris Agreement threshold for the first time.

The rise, driven by fossil fuel emissions and intensified by El Niño, caused extreme weather, record heatwaves, and widespread human suffering.

Experts warn the planet is on track for catastrophic 2.7°C heating by 2100 unless emissions drop 45% by 2030.

Despite renewable energy advances, 2024 saw record carbon emissions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gork@lemm.ee 47 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I remember when it was still believed we could keep under 1.5°C if we could hit our targets. But we didn't meet those targets and here we are.

Fuck.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

We didn't even try.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Back then (like, a few years ago, really), the idea was that the tipping point was far off.

When I was a kid (I’m mid 30s), we heard “if we don’t make changes over the next few decades, a couple hundred years into the future the world will start to become more hostile.”

A few short years later, it was “the coming generation will need to make changes or we will be leaving a world much less inhabitable for our children’s children.”

That very quickly turned into “this is happening right now.”

The talk of 1.5c warming was lifetimes off. And here we did it while the fuckin boomers are still clinging to power (in the US anyway).

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

Whereas now, the changes have already happened.

A decade ago, kinda - see e.g. wildfires in California every single quarter now (since 2014 iirc?), plus just about everywhere else as well like remember when Australia was on fire?

Okay so the 1.5 threshold wasn't reached a decade ago, but who even knows where the real tipping point is, or rather was.

But going along with your theme: it was supposed to be hundreds of years from now when the climate would change, and start to become more hostile. Whereas now, that "start" was a long way back, and some people born since then have already reached puberty.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

The entire targets thing was a lie. Kinda a soft approach to 'we are fucked'