this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
689 points (81.2% liked)

memes

10940 readers
4129 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You do know that it's illegal to be a socialist and hold any kind of government job in the United States? Brother we are in that country right now. But let's keep hearing you bitch about China.

Haters will say it's fake: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Control_Act_of_1954

[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

we are in that country right now

Links wiki article to anti-communist measures taken in 1954

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Got no more retort? Did you change your mind or just decide to stop thinking about it to save your precious idea of your country.

[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Still responding 3 days later, my comments must have cut deep lol. I replied to PyroNeurosis cause I actually cared for their reply, and then moved on to other discussions on this platform more meaningful than your retorts.

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago

People do sure like to avoid information that proves them wrong. I like making sure that they don't forget.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but also note that it hasn't been recinded, and our current Supreme Court has a soft spot for digging up forgotten legislation.

[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Fair point that it hasn't been rescinded, but I'm struggling to find any convictions based on this law or citations of this law ever being used in court, so it really does not seem relevant nowadays. If anyone can dig up any and reference them here, I'll gladly edit this comment to reflect that information.

There are laws from 1700s that haven't been rescinded but also bear no relevance to the modern day. California just changed old legal language stating that marriage was defined as being between a man and woman, but gay marriage has been legal for a long time now.

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Brother, that is still the laws on the books. Age does not matter. Do you really not understand that? Do you think laws expire? Did you choose to not understand? What's your deal? You live inside your own nightmare.