this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
271 points (88.0% liked)

Technology

60486 readers
4850 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That’s not a point in either’s favor. That’s a moral wash.

Ok, you're either trolling or been fed a lot of misinformation. The problem is about recency and extensiveness, and China is worse on both.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The USA has killed orders of magnitudes more people in the last few years. Just, objectively.

Source?

The problem with the Uyghurs in China is less about deaths and more about cultural genocide. They've been rounded up and jailed en-masse (estimates are upwards of a million people), threatened, surveilled, etc, all to force them to submit and abandon their cultural heritage. It's pretty similar in scope to the Japanese Internment in the US, but much larger in scope and with a much more nefarious goal.

I obviously don't have hard figures on the actual death toll (not sure anyone does, as China doesn't seem interested in disclosing it), but again, regardless of whether it's higher or lower than whatever you'll attribute to the US, the worst part here is forced cultural assimilation, or in other words, psychological violence (i.e. punishing "wrong thing").

[–] bishbosh@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is your point here that China's actions against Uyghurs is more recent and extensive than the US's part in Gaza?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Recent, extensive, and active. The US doesn't have a direct part in Gaza, China has a direct part in the issues w/ the Uyghurs.

I'm not saying the US is innocent here, just that they're very different situations.

[–] bishbosh@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The US doesn’t have a direct part in Gaza

This argument is incredibly hallow to me.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

hallow

Odd, because I didn't get it blessed by a priest. :)

Seriously though, there's a pretty big difference between doing the genocide yourself and supplying weapons to an ally, who uses those weapons for genocide.

[–] bishbosh@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think this is a very convenient position for the US. It fails to take into account the depth of connections between Israel and the US, and how much of the situation in Gaza can only happen because of the US.

Even if I grant that there is some genocide scaling factor because it's done by a vassal state, I still would argue the devastation of Gaza is certainly more far extensive.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The US has very little reason to target Palestinians, and most of the violence from Palestinian groups have targeted Israelis. The US is far more concerned about other groups in the region, like ISIS, the Taliban, and the Houthis. The main reason the US seems to care is because they successfully carried out an attack on our ally.

vassal state

The US has repeatedly told Israel to scale back their operations in Gaza and allow humanitarian aid in, yet they completely ignore it. There's absolutely no way Israel is anywhere close to a "vassal state," they do pretty much whatever they want.

But yeah, Israel is certainly emboldened by having such a powerful ally. That doesn't make the US responsible for Israeli actions though.

[–] bishbosh@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago

The US has very little reason to target Palestinians, and most of the violence from Palestinian groups have targeted Israelis.

The US has interest in having a foothold in the region. The foothold they've chosen is a settler colonial project that has reasons to exterminate the native population as settler projects often do.

The US is far more concerned about other groups in the region, like ISIS, the Taliban, and the Houthis.

These are pretty small concerns, the actual concerns in the region are the nation states that oppose US hegemony.

The main reason the US seems to care is because they successfully carried out an attack on our ally.

US aid to Israel did not start with October 7th.

The US has repeatedly told Israel to scale back their operations in Gaza and allow humanitarian aid in, yet they completely ignore it. There’s absolutely no way Israel is anywhere close to a “vassal state,” they do pretty much whatever they want.

Actions speak louder than words, and all of our actions seem to suggest they can do no wrong. So maybe consider that just because we say otherwise doesn't actual mean we want their actions to scale back.

That doesn’t make the US responsible for Israeli actions though.

The US is arming, funding, and blocking accountability from the UN. How many times do we have to reload the gun before the shooting is our fault too?