this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
369 points (98.2% liked)

AnarchyChess

5364 readers
188 users here now

Holy hell

Other chess communities:
!Chess@lemmy.ml
!chessbeginners@sh.itjust.works

Matrix space

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

https://handbook.fide.com/chapter/E012023 3.7.3.3 No.

It'd be an extreme edge case where not promoting would be useful.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Pawn can't capture sideways, how would it ever be useful?

[–] gamma@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Forcing stalemate if you're super down in material

[–] Mr_Fish@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Maybe if any promotion would lead to a stalemate

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 4 points 1 month ago

If your opponent plays strictly by a point system, like a computer might, and if the piece is threatened, it might be beneficial to keep the value low to trick the oppont to do something else, while you keep the useless pawn as an obstruction, which could somehow limit your opponent's future moves.

Anyway, it's apparantly not allowed.

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Well exactly. I can't think of one. It could only be useful in a situation where having a dead weight in a cell would solve some problem or other, but I've no idea how.