this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
14 points (81.8% liked)

Casual Conversation

1956 readers
224 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 22/01/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have two cars, but I actually hate cars.

I chose to have a house in the mountains, but I hate snow.

I work out hard and have abs that I show off, but people who show off their abs annoy me.

I'm a writer and make income doing it in addition to my retirement pension, but writers annoy me and I never tell my friends that I'm a writer.

I also paint and have had my stuff in some galleries, but artists annoy me and I never tell any of my friends that I paint.

I've chosen all those things. Not by necessity, but just choice. Can you be a contrarian to your own views or does that definition have to involve opposing someone else's views just to troll?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.kya.moe 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

a sizable population of people who don’t give two flying fucks which facet of the Plutocrat Party is running the USA

Now that is the case, I totally agree.

3 months ago, things were very different. Also, I am talking specifically on .world. That's the instance where most of my drama came from

And for the record, there are lots of people leaving .world for that very reason now. It's become a very toxic pro-censorship instance and people are leaving.

My post/comment history is public, as are the modlogs. If you're bored enough, feel free to look at my comments and the replies I'd get. You'll see for yourself it's because people thought my advocating for third party was treason: https://lemmy.world/u/UniversalMonk

What are your theories for the "hatred"? If you find any samples of posts/commetns that are offensive, please post them.

Because honestly I haven't gotten much drama since the election, because to your point, lots of people are pro third-party now. Most of the people who continue to organize for my ban always bring up the .world drama from 3 months ago before the election, and they are usually from there.

.world Biden/Harris supporters have a very long memory and hold grudges! lolol

Also, I haven't been banned from any instances since the election. Yet I haven't changed my stance or attitude at all. So I think that's pretty telling.

Thanks, friend!