this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
953 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

60948 readers
4556 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TLDR if you don't wanna watch the whole thing: Benaminute (the Youtuber here) creates a fresh YouTube account and watches all recommended shorts without skipping. They repeat this 5 times, where they change their location to a random city in the US.

Below is the number of shorts after which alt-right content was recommended. Left wing/liberal content was never recommended first.

  1. Houston: 88 shorts
  2. Chicago: 98 shorts
  3. Atlanta: 109 shorts
  4. NYC: 247 shorts
  5. San Fransisco: never (Benaminute stopped after 250 shorts)

There however, was a certain pattern to this. First, non-political shorts were recommended. After that, AI Jesus shorts started to be recommended (with either AI Jesus talking to you, or an AI narrator narrating verses from the Bible). After this, non-political shorts by alt-right personalities (Jordan Peterson, Joe Rogan, Ben Shapiro, etc.) started to be recommended. Finally, explicitly alt-right shorts started to be recommended.

What I personally found both disturbing and kinda hilarious was in the case of Chicago. The non-political content in the beginning was a lot of Gen Alpha brainrot. Benaminute said that this seemed to be the norm for Chicago, as they had observed this in another similar experiment (which dealt with long-form content instead of shorts). After some shorts, there came a short where AI Gru (the main character from Despicable Me) was telling you to vote for Trump. He was going on about how voting for "Kamilia" would lose you "10000 rizz", and how voting for Trump would get you "1 million rizz".

In the end, Benaminute along with Miniminuteman propose a hypothesis trying to explain this phenomenon. They propose that alt-right content might be inciting more emotion, thus ranking high up in the algorithm. They say the algorithm isn't necessarily left wing or right wing, but that alt-right wingers have understood the methodology of how to capture and grow their audience better.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 65 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I keep getting recommendations for content like "this woke person got DESTROYED by logic" on YouTube. Even though I click "not interested", and even "don't recommend channel", I keep getting the same channel, AND video recommendation(s). It's pretty obvious bullshit.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

You'd think a recommendation algorithm should take your preferences into account - that's the whole justification for tracking your usage in the first place: recommending relevant content for you...

[–] AcesFullOfKings@feddit.uk 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

recommending relevant content for you

The aim is not to recommend relevant content. The aim is to recommend content you will engage with. That may be because you're interested, or it may be because it's ragebait that you will hate but watch anyway.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 11 hours ago

Even in the best-intentioned recommender system, trained on the content you watch to estimate what you're interested in and recommend similar things, that would be the drift of things. You can't really mathematically judge the emotions the viewers might feel unless they express them in a measurable way, so observing their behaviour and recommending similar by whatever heuristic. And if they keep clicking on rageposts, that's what the system has to go on.

But at least giving the explicit indication "I don't want to see this" should be heavily weighted in that calculation. Just straight up ignoring that is an extra layer of awful.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago

YOU'D THINK THAT YES. [caps intended]

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

it is. But who said that **you ** get to decide what's relevant for you? Welcome and learn to trust your algorithmic overlords

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 14 hours ago

Thanks, I hate it

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

The algorithms are always trying to poke you in the id.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 hours ago

I feel like it at least used to pretend that it was doing this (YouTube) at least.

I can't say for recently as I use a third party client these days and do not log in.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 20 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Anything but the subscriptions page is absolute garbage on that site. Ideally get an app to track your subs without having to have an account. NewPipe, FreeTube etc.

And if you don't want to deal with those breaking (becaue google is actively shooting them in the face) they DO provide RSS feeds for your creators.

Just add the channel url to your feed reader (ex. https://www.youtube.com/@LinusTechTips )and forget the youtube webui exists.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Are those available on PC/Linux? On my TV? 😭 I have them on my phone but I feel like there's too much hassle to do on my main viewing devices.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I use FreeTube on Linux. I think it's Chromium based, so some people don't like it, and it's usually one of the bigger resource hogs when I have it open, but its worth it for the ad-free, subscriptions-only experience imo...

Though lately it hasn't been behaving well with the vpn...

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, on PC I'm not really having much issue. I don't fall for "recommendations", and I run ublock origin in Firefox so I have zero ads. All good there. The TV is the worst though...

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Well you asked if it worked on PC so... lol

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

I know, sorry. I realized it wasn't an issue on PC after the fact.

But the TV... It's brutal, the amount of long, unskippable ads. It's worse than on regular/linear television.