this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
598 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19536 readers
3048 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

A constitutional amendment required 2/3s House and Senate AND 3/4 of states. And they don’t have that. This is more bullshit to distract.

To amend the U.S. Constitution, a proposed amendment must be approved by a two-thirds majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and then ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures (38 out of 50 states). Alternatively, an amendment can be proposed by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures, but this method has never been used.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is more bullshit to distract.

This is saying it louder for the people in the back. Musk's Nazi Salute isn't getting the message across? Okay, how about this?

[–] SoftTeeth@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They so desperatly want a hidden militia to come out of the woodwork and coup the country for them

Those people are either dead from covid, too old to fight for their coup, or are just LARPers and actually aren't interested in dying for a con man.

[–] psud@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The ones Trump let out of prison were willing to do violence, including killing police officers. They're a credible threat.

[–] SoftTeeth@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

That's not enough people, but we should definitely watch them

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

well a shit ton were just released from jail after being paroled for j6

[–] FringeTheory999@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ok. How many votes do they need to change the rule governing how many votes a constitutional amendment requires?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That would also be an amendment to the Constitution.

The last amendment that passed took over 200 years to get through the process.

[–] cammoblammo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

True, but that’s mainly because they forgot about it.

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

the same amount,

The United States Constitution Article V:

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So if people commit crimes against Trump, he isn't protected? No laws right?

[–] cammoblammo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Depends on the crime. One would think the Second Amendment might cover some crimes.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

He’s protected by his sycophant, who have unlimited money.

I mean, kind of. People only follow laws because they believe that the laws will shield them when it is their turn. Otherwise it's just 'those with power do what they want.'

When regular people stop believing in the law, you get Luigis.