Patient Gamers

11444 readers

16 users here now

A gaming community free from the hype and oversaturation of current releases, catering to gamers who wait at least 12 months after release to play a game. Whether it's price, waiting for bugs/issues to be patched, DLC to be released, don't meet the system requirements, or just haven't had the time to keep up with the latest releases.

^(placeholder)^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

briongloid@aussie.zone

cod@lemmy.world

BurntWits@sh.itjust.works

157

Is there a game that you've been very patient for, which turned out to be dissappointing when you finally started playing it? (lemm.ee)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by verycoolusername@lemm.ee to c/patientgamers@sh.itjust.works

247 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Personally there are a few games which left me very dissappointed, after hyping myself up for years in certain cases.

Divinity Original Sin: turns out I prefer more streamlined, less packed games (love Pillars of Eternity) and that coop play in a CRPG stresses me out.

Wasteland 2: I actually managed to finish this one but secretly I admit I was hoping for a better Fallout which I didn't really get. New Vegas did the cowboy theme much better.

INSIDE: while the design was cool, it was just a ton of boring, easy puzzles in comparison to LIMBO, its predecessor.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mrbubblesort@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Halo. I picked up the collection in the summer steam sale for $10 and it was just ... boring. I guess that's to be expected for a 20+ year old game, the genre has innovated and improved a lot since then.

[–] Strafer@artemis.camp 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I felt this a bit too. I never played it back in the day so I was playing it fresh as each game released as part of the PC master collection. Playing Halo 1 without nostalgia googles is rough as that campaign has not aged well. It’s starts decent but then reusing the same levels made the second half a mediocre slog.

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

Yep, same here. I found it really strange when the running was much slower than other games too

[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Halo is one of my favorite games of all time, and I played the shit out of the first one when it came out. It was absolutely game changing for console shooters. Before that, I hada SNES (skipped N64 era). It absolutely blew my mind.

Unfortunately, I don't think it really held up. If you played it back then, the nostalgia still hits hard and that's fun. But if you play it for the first time now, it just won't hit the same, unfortunately.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Having just played through the MCC recently the first halo is a bit dated, but 2 and 3 are some great campaigns. Reach and odst have decent stories, but the campaign is more average. The biggest surprise to me was how much worse 4 is than I remember. I knew it was disappointing, but playing it back to back with the others really makes it obvious.

I had played all the games before though.

[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I agree with you. I bought the entire Halo collection on sale. Played it for a while but it got extremely boring after a while. Haven't I cleared this room before? Guess not. Let's see where this leads... oh, another room just like the others. Screw this, I'll spend my time on Half-Life 2 instead.

Also, finally got Quake 4 (free on Amazon Prime Gaming) and it feels a lot like Halo. I prefer the newly launched Quake 2, thank you very much.