Asklemmy

44625 readers

1157 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What are your thoughts about video game preservation? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by LiamTheBox@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I think its unnecessarily convoluted, the Entertainment Software Association (ESA) are morons and need to get a life.

Including their cousins like the MPA and RIAA.

https://gamehistory.org/87percent

I am currently doing research around this topic for my University work and have created a google form for people to respond, but I need to make sure it is clean and respects everyone's privacy.

You can request my signal group through direct messages if you would like to fill it out once it releases, I have other plans to have a talk as a (focus) group.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It makes sense, unfortunately.

They don't want to compete with older games. For a time, new games would innovate technologically and qualitatively, but that isn't always the case anymore.

There are so many amazing games to play. If you wanted to, you could cut off all future content from this day on, and still have more than enough to remain entertained for the rest of your life.

Some studios are still pushing the envelope, but others have stuck with one "as a service" game for almost a decade now. Others still are making stuff that is objectvly unworthy of being played compared to earlier games.

If you can't make each game better than the last, people will just go back to the last game. But if you take away the last game, they'll go to the new game simply because the same game but worse is still better than nothing.

And that's true overrall, too. If you like games, but can't play your favorite game anymore, you'll probably end up trying to find something new.

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

There are so many amazing games to play. If you wanted to, you could cut off all future content from this day on, and still have more than enough to remain entertained for the rest of your life.

If you can’t make each game better than the last, people will just go back to the last game. But if you take away the last game, they’ll go to the new game simply because the same game but worse is still better than nothing.

Isn't this true for every form of media though? Books, TV shows, movies, music; there are multiple lifetimes worth of content for anyone that wants to look for it. What makes video games so special?

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Video games as a medium, is still new. And that state of so much you could drown in it, is also new.

Just a couple decades ago you could conceivably play every game ever made, and then be left thirsting for something new.

And games are plateauing technologically, if not mechanically. New games are no longer better, just because they're newer, with nicer graphics, bigger worlds and smoother gameplay. That stuff has been figured out.

Now you have to make games better, by making them better.