this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
67 points (94.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5276 readers
540 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
67
US Vice President Kamala Harris, in Seattle, says the clock ‘is banging’ on climate change (www.seattletimes.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Archived copy of the article

Video of her speech

Much of the speech is a discussion of how the Inflation Reduction Act has kick-started the building of decarbonizaiton infrastructure in the US.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Depends on whether you're doing something like shopping for a used car (tax credit for buying used EVs) or looking for a job (a ton of new factories are going up)

Pretty similar to how the NLRA doesn't directly impact you most days, but changes the overall economic environment.

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It did directly effect people when it was passed though, is my point. No one went to work the day after the NLRA was passed without having it directly effect both their work and their lives.

Most people aren’t shopping for a used car, especially not a used EV, they’re trying to survive in one of the worst periods of US economics in the last 40 years for the lower classes. EV credits are just middle class and up giveaways. The E-Bike program in my city has had more of a material effect on the lives of the lower classes than ALL of the EV credits put together.

My point is, people are material beings, and their perceptions are colored by their material reality. When someone is going around touting how good their policy is while the majority of the country is struggling just to make ends meet, and will never have a chance to benefit from things like EV credits, its not going to win any supporters that weren’t already on your side, and in fact risks alienating those on the fence.