this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
119 points (70.9% liked)

Technology

59251 readers
3768 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
119
I'm worried that in the future we will be forced to use smartphones just like in China (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by ULTIMATEDEAD@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world
124 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In China, you can't exist without a smartphone, because for all existential things you have to do (paying bills, buying tickets etc.) , you are forced to use the almighty wechat app. Smartphones are a tool to manipulate and to spy on the population. It is a tool utilized by the ruling class, to control the masses. I hate the future and I hate "progress".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Korkki@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah and the problem here would be that it all would happen in one app? Seriously? It would only be a problem if google or Microsoft owned and controlled it and ran it rampantly for their own profit, not if it's handled as a public utility as such things should. That's why WeChat-like apps are progress and the future.

[–] meekah@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, centralized applications should never be the future. Of course technology that connects us is the future. But I'd prefer to see a federated system for that, similar to lemmy

[–] Korkki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In some applications centralisation is the only feasible solution. Decentralisation and cynical fear of centralisation is never the excuse to create and accept shit.

[–] meekah@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

We live in the age of information. Data is power. So centralization of data is centralization of power. I prefer the power to be distributed a bit more equally than it is nowadays.

I agree that sometimes centralization is the only feasible solution. But those cases should be kept to a minimum, regulated and closely monitored