this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
56 points (96.7% liked)

Canada

7545 readers
594 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25221878

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25218430

Quick vid summarizing it all for those who do not have time to read through

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0M-e9GEn_A

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I can't say I'm particularly outraged by any of the proposed legislative changes, but I feel like there's some reading between the lines that would need to be done.

Like their transportation memo embraces new and innovative technology, while ignoring the innovation and efficiency that can be gained by leveraging existing technology. Canada's train legislation is in dire need of reform.

If they centralize control of transport policy in the federal government, but then declare the needs of suburbs take priority over the needs of cities, then we could end up with a Doug Ford in charge who works to eradicate cycling infrastructure nationwide, and turn cities into mere corridors for cars to pass through to other destinations.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Like their transportation memo embraces new and innovative technology, while ignoring the innovation and efficiency that can be gained by leveraging existing technology. Canada's train legislation is in dire need of reform.

This is what I gathered too. The standard tactic of distracting the government and the public from known good solutions, to spend money on something else instead which happens benefit them. Example - Hyperloop as a distraction from high speed rail.

Either way, I wouldn't expect for-profit tech CEOs who aren't experts in public services like transportation or health to propose reforms that put the public's benefit first. I'd expect that from a city planner, a Metrolinx person, a university expert, some other public servant, or adjacent.