this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
60 points (95.5% liked)

movies

2268 readers
303 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Essentially as long as it's never shown to anyone and considered a non viable product they can claim the budget which was lost against their profit when doing taxes.

It lowers the amount of profit it looks like they had that year and this reduces the taxes they owe.
This is done in lots of industries all over the place, grocery stores toss lots of food and mark it for loss to keep taxes low as long as you never lower the costs so cheap that it isn't worth it. Electronic components as well, chips being a usual one for throwing some away to quickly lower profits.

[–] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 2 points 20 minutes ago* (last edited 18 minutes ago)

Thanks for the concise explanation and clarifying its broader than this industry. I love finding out all the unique ways we align incentives against humanity/ reality. Is there any reason why a rule like this might actually help? Or is it the typical "there was a real reason at one point, but now its just a loophole being abused"?