this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
14 points (88.9% liked)

Selfhosted

40173 readers
919 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
14
ATX case with room for 5 hard drives (upvote.au)
submitted 1 year ago by dan@upvote.au to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm replacing an SFF PC (HP ProDesk 600 G5 SFF) I'm using as a server with a larger one that'll function as a server and a NAS, and all I want is a case that would have been commonplace 10-15 years ago:

  • Fits an ATX motherboard.
  • Fits at least 4-5 hard drives.
  • Is okay sitting on its side instead of upright (or even better, is built to be horizontal) since it'll be sitting on a wire shelving unit (replacing the SFF PC here: https://upvote.au/post/11946)
  • No glass side panel, since it'll be sitting horizontally.
  • Ideally space for a fan on the left panel

It seems like cases like this are hard to find these days. The two I see recommended are the Fractal Design Define R5 and the Cooler Master N400, both of which are quite old. The Streacom F12C was really nice but it's long gone now, having been discontinued many years ago.

Unfortunately I don't have enough depth for a full-depth rackmount server; I've got a very shallow rack just for networking equipment.

Does anyone have recommendations for any cases that fit these requirements?

My desktop PC has a Fractal Design Define R4 that I bought close to 10 years ago... I'm tempted to just buy a new case for it and repurpose the Define R4 for the server.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] talkingpumpkin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I love you bot, but... PCIe is just "PCI express", NAS nowadays means more "home server" than network-attached storage, and no one even ever knew what SATA is supposed to expand to.

There are acronyms that are shortened versions of meaningful names and then there are acronyms that are actual meaningful names for which some meaningless (and quickly forgotten) expansion happens to exist.

[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

PCIe is just “PCI express”

I side with the bot here. You can't expand an acronym to something that still contains an acronym 😛

On the other hand, the bot does that when it expands "SATA" to "Serial AT Attachment" lol. Should be "Serial Advanced Technology Attachment", or "Serial ATA" if we go with your approach :)

[–] talkingpumpkin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well... if one must believe their own logo, (see https://sata-io.org/) "SATA" shoud actually be expanded to "Serial ATA" :)

Acronyms of acronyms may not be super-common, but they do exist: eg. Cisco has a network protocol they call "PVST", which means "Per-VLAN Spanning Tree", where "VLAN" is "Virtual Local Area Network" (or "Virtual LAN"; LAN is another of those acronyms that is mostly regarded as being its own word).

In open source, there's a long tradition of recursive acronyms: eg. "Linux" means "Linux is not Unix", which you can't be expanded (in finite time) according to your rule :)

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 1 year ago

Interesting comment. Thanks!