this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
244 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

61916 readers
2133 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 28 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Those poor suckers. I don't think I've seen an advertisement on YouTube in something like five years.

Edit: And I sure as hell ain't paying Google either.

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 9 points 3 hours ago

Fuck yeah.

For anyone out of the loop, look into Freetube and Grayjay. There are other apps that do the same thing too, but those are good to start with.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl -5 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

If you see 0 ads and don't pay anyone, I'm not sure how the service could be sustainable. I'm also against ads but only if you're actually paying. That's why I do pay for a yt family plan but also use adblock+sponsorblock.

I'm not sure how the service could be sustainable.

Bold of you to assume any of us give a shit about keeping Alphabet's operations sustainable for them.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Google has plenty of money. That's the way I see it.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 points 32 minutes ago

Afaik, business units are individual. Their products don't finance each other.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 hours ago

It's not. Why do you want it to be? It's one of the most enduring social media monopolies, and it should be brought down. The more they lose revenue, the more they are forced to squeeze, the more they enshittify, the more people are pushed to make and use alternatives, and the stronger those alternatives get.

Honestly once youtube's network can be usurped by something like peertube, I think that might be the ballgame for centralised social media. It is the hardest one to topple because of bandwidth costs, which means once it goes the case for needing a corporation to fund our networks kind of collapses with it.