this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
372 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

62013 readers
4588 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Schorsch@feddit.org 11 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

nb4 someone laughs at us Germans for pulling out of nuclear power: No, nuclear is not cheap. It's literally the most expensive way to generate electricity. Solar is cheap and better for the environment.

[–] troed@fedia.io 12 points 10 hours ago

Nuclear is cheaper than your average electricity cost.

I know because I'm Swedish and you use us as your cheap electricity.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 8 points 10 hours ago

No, nuclear is not cheap. It’s literally the most expensive way to generate electricity

Source?

Beats coal anytime. Or Russian gas.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

French electricity enters the chat.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Nuclear is reliable, predictable and stable 24/7 source. Solar not so much and possibly not that great for the environment if we don't figure out what to do with used solar panels. Also their production is not exactly clean. Whereas nuclear requires a wasted fuel storage somewhere and the fuel will eventually run out of radiation in some hundreds of thousands years.