318
PornHub owner MindGeek is threatening a kebab shop in NYC with trademark infringement
(www.theverge.com)
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
318 points (96.0% liked)
Technology
59223 readers
3330 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Trademark's a weird one, if you don't defend it you lose it. So it's kind of a lose-lose situation from the trademarkers position. They have to pursue or they lose their trademark which they value
Removed as a protest against the community's support for campaigns to bring about the deaths of members of marginalized groups, and opposition to private entities working to prevent such campaigns, together with it's mindless flaming and downvoting of anyone who disagrees.
Idk the combination of the white text followed by black text within an orange rounded rectangle logo when paired with tag lines like 'get stuffed' might lead people to think it's a subsidiary or something similar.
A place known for it's sausages and a restaurant may seem like a strange business partnership but stranger things have happened.
Yeah but if you don't sue, a legitimate infringer in the future might use not enforcing on the trademark there to argue there own case. Trademark law really doesn't leave trademark holders in a good position. Though I imagine that a lawsuit when those laws were written weren't nearly as prohibitively expensive.
Removed as a protest against the community's support for campaigns to bring about the deaths of members of marginalized groups, and opposition to private entities working to prevent such campaigns, together with it's mindless flaming and downvoting of anyone who disagrees.
Pretty sure it would have to be determined in a court of law that an infringement occurred in the first place.
I mean, if they don't care about the actual usage, they could licence it for a buck or something
As a non-American, US intellectual property law feels absolutely ridiculous to me sometimes. It feels like it incentivizes all the wrong behaviours.
It's hard to balance but it prevents trademark squatters from existing like in the domain name space
As a US Citizen I agree. We also let corporations lobby to make the rules have no relation to what they were set up for.
Copyright for instance was supposed to allow people to use novel work in the open without getting copied for a short period of time before it became public domain. Now Copyright is nearly perpetual, it keeps getting extended when a certain mouse is close to losing their copyright.