345
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Nobody likes nuclear, but it's less bad than terraforming our own planet.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Except he was in a position to push nuclear instead of a cockamamie scheme where you need to launch hundreds of rockets that are 10x the size of the Saturn V over the course of years to build solar farms the size of Manhattan.

A man who once had radioactive piss from a nuclear accident chose that over nukes.

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Governments are starting to experiment with SSPSes so we'll likely see those start to replace coal too.

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, he didn't. He (or rather, Congress) financed a lot of research into alternative energy due to the oil crisis.

In actual fact, he pushed mostly for coal as a domestic energy source as a response to the oil crisis. His main concern regarding nuclear during his presidency was due to proliferation concerns.

In his defense, the magnitude of impact of fossil fuels on climate change was not as well understood during his presidency. That would take another 10 years.

As I said, 1988 was the year Congress got the expert testimonials and when the UN founded the IPCC.

this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
345 points (98.3% liked)

World News

38977 readers
2275 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS