this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
38 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

901 readers
114 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Both are useful in achieveing American political aims abroad, so getting rid of them seems like a bad choice from the perspective of the US government

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Because his racist hillbilly supporters have been led to believe 10 to 15% of the country's budget is spend on poor not-white-enough freeloaders in other countries. It's a populist move.

[–] davel@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I don’t think that is a sufficient reason for it, but a fringe benefit of it and cover story for it.

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Dullard, you're doing a great job, demonstrating the need to consider foreign policy and political economy as the main factor, beyond mere culture wars and all that.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

I'm well aware of the controversial nature of USAID, and I don't deny that it is possibly desirable to wind it down for moral reasons - although not like that, obviously.

But I guarantee you Trump isn't intelligent enough to consider that. He's just wrecking it as visibly as possible to please his NASCAR-loving fan base.

Musk on the other hand probably has other motives.