this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
1156 points (96.2% liked)

Comic Strips

14126 readers
2425 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Why is it crazy? It seems like the most sensible conclusion - no kids reduces stress significantly. Maybe in a world without need it’d be the other way around, but we don’t live in a post-scarcity society, do we?

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 22 points 4 days ago

mist Americans can’t afford kids, the main reason is simple as that

curious what happiness rates look like in real first world countries

[–] azzblaster@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 days ago

Meaning has a lot to do with happiness and for me, my life has infinitely more meaning since the little one came along. A lot of people don’t need help finding meaning in their lives and that’s great, but taking care of my family is more rewarding than anything I have experienced. But yeah… not everyone is like me and that’s okay. Some people definitely shouldn’t have and/or don’t want kids and there’s nothing wrong with that.

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Because it's a simplistic blanket statement about a very complex issue. You think you can take a single factor "kids = stress" and that's that?

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No, but I do believe that complex issues with many factors can be boiled down into simpler averages. Besides, “stress” is just as multifaceted of an issue as anything else! It implies nothing about the root causes.

Moreover, this research article did not say “if you have kids, you will be miserable”. That is a personal choice you should make for personal reasons. Some people are happier with kids! But it’s also true that childless adults are on average happier.

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

The article did not say that but the originator of this thread did.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 4 days ago

So nobody can arrive at any conclusions about complex topics? That's like saying we can't quantify global warning because climate science is complex.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I'm trying to imagine applying this logic to anything else.

Telling a friend not to try out for the baseball team, because playing baseball will increase your stress. Warning my sister not to watch a scary movie, because evidence shows they cause fear and discomfort. Breaking off a date with a cutie, because I've got butterflies and I don't want to feel anxious.

What do these sociologists think about rollercoasters or car races or heavy metal concerts, I wonder?

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You’re trying to incorrectly put words in scientist’s mouths here.

They did not say that a person should not have children.

They merely said that on average, people who don’t have children are happier.

If people could accidentally find themselves trapped in a heavy metal concert, (just like people accidentally find themselves stuck being parents), you’d find a similar conclusion - people who don’t go to heavy metal concerts are happier. But it turns out that concerts are elective, so the effect is unlikely to be present in real life for concerts.

This has nothing to do with the “goodness“ of concerts or parenthood - both of them are awesome when the people doing them chose to do it!