this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
38 points (100.0% liked)
Ask Lemmygrad
901 readers
116 users here now
A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
PNAC was about trying to lay a foundation that would maintain the US's unipolar global hegemony for the whole of the 21st century. I see this as a departure from that and the acknowledgement that a new strategy of empire is needed.
Yes and no, they had contingency. It's primary focus was getting into the middle east as fast as possible to try and secure the unipolar world but even in 2003 they knew that China was going to be a threat to imperial interests and they would have to contend for the power. If you read through the white papers this really isn't a departure though, they wanted to get rid on all non military spending and use the military to run the empire instead of the business empire of the past. Considering they want to wrap up Ukraine as fast as possible and close the Russian front so they can focus on Taiwan and China is a last gasp of the PNAC plan to prevent true multipolarism from starting. Listen to their language about BRICs to get a hint of their plans, they want to nip it in the blood. It is just that they're too late.