this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
243 points (74.3% liked)

World News

32348 readers
594 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnBrownsBussy2@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To be technical, did the US actually fund the Taliban when it got started? The Pakistani intelligence service did, and the Taliban were only able to take power because of the US-backed Mujahideen alliance rapidly descended into civil war when the Soviets pulled out and the Afghan government fell, but idk.

[–] immuredanchorite@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But wasn't Pakistan also thoroughly a US puppet at this point?

[–] nohaybanda@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

And still is. The US did a soft coup in Pakistan earlier this year

[–] masquenox@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

All the armaments the US supplied (most of which actually came from China) to the Mujahideen was distributed by Pakistani intelligence services - that is true. However, the US knew perfectly well who the Pakistanis were giving these weapons to - it had been longstanding US foreign policy SOP to nurture and support far-right, reactionary Islamism as a counter to middle-eastern nationalism. That's the reason the "big bads" in the middle-east now are people like Osama and not people like Arafat.