Privacy

34307 readers

1990 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

626

[SWE] Swedish government wants a back door in Signal (www.svt.se)

submitted 2 days ago by Wolfie@lemm.ee to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

116 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Swedish government wants a back door in signal for police and 'Säpo' (Swedish federation that checks for spies)

Let's say that this becomes a law and Signal decides to withdraw from Sweden as they clearly state that they won't implement a back door; would a citizen within the country still be able to use and access Signals services? Assuming that google play services probably would remove the Signal app within Sweden (which I also don't use)

I just want the government to go f*ck themselves, y'know?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 150 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wherever a service with encryption exists any government in the world thinks they need to be the special child with the access to the contents.

E2E with privately generated and held keys, have you published your PGP public key yet?

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

E2E with privately generated and held keys, have you published your PGP public key yet?

Exactly. You can't stop secure encryption.

I remember in the very old days of the internet when only the US had strong encryption and thought it was some gotcha. They labeled it a weapon to prevent overseas export. Phil Zimmerman created PGP, lobbed the source into a book (protected under 1st amendment) then shipped it overseas.

If strong encryption exists and people want to use it, you're just not going to be able to stop them.

[–] phase@lemmy.8th.world 5 points 2 days ago

Reminds me of the story of immigrants who tatooed the algorithm on their back. It was illegal to send them back.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wish PGP was easier to use. The barrier to entry is way too high for everyday use.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's a function built into Thunderbird to create keys, and I think publish the public cert directly to the MIT repo.

[–] dajoho@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

While I appreciate they have it, this is still rocket science when you describe it to an average user of mail. This stuff needs to be almost automatic and happen in the background for it to really be used by the masses. :-(