this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
29 points (93.9% liked)

Vegan

986 readers
2 users here now

A community to discuss anything related to veganism.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] the_elder@midwest.social -2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm sure plantbasednews.org is a non-biased, reputable news source.

[–] november@lemmy.vg 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The article links to the study, but go ahead and keep stuffing your fingers in your ears.

[–] the_elder@midwest.social -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah none of the studies linked put animal ag over 17% of global emissions, while it provides the majority of protein to the global populace. Sanctioning the biggest polluters (e.g. big oil, chemical companies, etc) would be a far more effective means of reducing global pollution. That's not to say we can't reduce our consumption of animal protein - we absolutely should, IMO - but calling 17% tops the leading cause is a spurious argument.

[–] houseofleft@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 week ago

I'm not sure I follow, 17% sounds like a large amount and easily could be called "the leading cause" if the next highest industry is less that 17%?

Are you thinking along the lines that 50%+ is needed before describing something as leading?

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 7 points 1 week ago

This is why it's a good idea to read the study and not just rely on whatever news outlets tell you.

[–] bushparty@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Makes sense to judge, assume, and dismiss before reading anything! That way you only get the good and correct news! Smrt!