this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
360 points (95.9% liked)

News

25665 readers
4767 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the note, shared internally and viewed by the New York Times, Brin urges staff working on Google’s Gemini AI projects to put in long hours to help the company lead the race in artificial general intelligence (AGI).

Some have praised Brin’s commitment to pushing the company’s success, but others argue that his approach reflects an outdated and harmful mindset.

“The hustle-centric 60-hour week isn’t productivity—it’s burnout waiting to happen,” wrote workplace mental health educator Catherine Eadie in a post shared by LinkedIn’s news editors.

Others said they feel that hard work is essential for success, with a COO of a business analytics business writing, “Brin is just being honest—successful people have always put in long hours."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

So you want the entire world to be forced to live in equivalents of Manhattan, or ideally, Kowloon Walled City?

Also, you say you're against people driving to work, but the other potential consequence is that people in medium density cities are going to be told that they're no longer allowed to walk to work.

Look, population density in general is good. Forcing it by telling employers they're now both allowed AND encouraged to discriminate employees based on where they live is going to have so many unintended consequences there's no point in even entertaining the thought. If they're not allowed to discriminate, people are going to intentionally move far enough away to have a 4 hour commute each way.

There's no winning here, the only way to make things better is to lobby for better zoning laws if you live in a country where those commonly prevent high-rises or mixed-use neighborhoods. That benefits everyone, regardless of whether they want to live in an apartment smaller than a standard shipping container, a luxury penthouse, or in the suburbs.

If you want maximum density, you need cities to be built from the ground up like they do in China. START with the skyscrapers, instead of building them when enough people live there for there to be demand.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't really believe private car ownership should even be allowed and should be replaced entirely by either dense cities where we can walk to our jobs or public transit, preferably trains. That way we can still have small towns, but you have to take the train now.

Ultimately you're right, the only way to make things better is using central planning like they do in China. There is no market reform that can save us.

That doesn't change the fact that commuting should be considered part of your job. You can't work without it.

Unless you work remotely,! Oh look, another thing that would be incentivized by paying people for their commutes.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Okay, so you're for completely tearing up all rural communities and abolishing farms, I can dig that. What about people who get mental health issues from living in the concrete jungle though?

Then there's people like me. I work as a software engineer, but can't work at home for shit. Too many distractions. However, if I started commuting to work in this proposed system, my employer would have to pay me the same for fewer hours spent on the actual work, or pay more for the same amount of hours, just because it takes me half an hour to walk to work and half an hour to walk back home as I live pretty far from the city center. I imagine I'd be told to fuck off if I wanted to go to the office. Okay, technically all this no longer applies because I'm now working for myself at home (which has been a bit of a mistake), but it would have applied a few months ago.

Also what about factories and such? They often pollute, so it's actually better if you have them a slight distance away from major population centers. But if they have to start paying for peoples' commutes, you'd have to have them in-between apartment buildings to save money.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Okay, so you’re for completely tearing up all rural communities and abolishing farms, I can dig that. What about people who get mental health issues from living in the concrete jungle though?

No, I did say that we can have trains.

I live in Iowa, we also have a shuttle program that transports ag workers without cars. The farm to market routes are perfectly usable for shuttles (basically they're like small buses and large taxies)

We can actually abolish private car ownership without forcing everyone to live in the concrete jungle (although I think many of the issues caused by cities could be addressed by better and safer infrastructure, I recognize cities can be overstimulating for some people).

However, if I started commuting to work in this proposed system, my employer would have to pay me the same for fewer hours spent on the actual work, or pay more for the same amount of hours, just because it takes me half an hour to walk to work and half an hour to walk back home as I live pretty far from the city center.

So under the current system you are having an hour stolen from you every day because of the commute. That's unpaid labor! Commuting is actual work! You have to do it for your job, that means it's work.

You're essentially saying "my employer needs to be able to steal labor time from me to make me employable" and that's a serious problem.

Also what about factories and such? They often pollute, so it’s actually better if you have them a slight distance away from major population centers. But if they have to start paying for peoples’ commutes, you’d have to have them in-between apartment buildings to save money.

Factories can be much cleaner than they have been, but zoning laws take care of this. Factories would like to not have to pay for longer commutes, but that's too bad because the city won't let them build inside of neighborhoods. Also, the shuttle program here in Iowa also transports factory, warehouse, and meat packing workers.

Look either the employer has to pay for the commute or the government does, but either way we need to incentivize shorter commutes and we need to pay workers for the time stolen from them by their commutes.