this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
831 points (96.2% liked)

World News

32311 readers
1098 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Silverseren@kbin.social 169 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Okay, corruption like that should be corrected. Regardless, there's no scientific evidence that aspartame is harmful. Let alone a biochemical reason for why a dipeptide of two amino acids, phenylalanine and aspartic acid, that dissociates in the stomach into its constituent components and some byproducts would be harmful in the first place.

Unless you have phenylketonuria, but you have much bigger problems in that case and, if that is the case for you, kudos on being at an age and capability to read and understand this post, you are incredible.

Edit: Also, just noticed the part about US Right To Know, which is a well known anti-science group that's been pushing pseudoscience and fearmongering about other topics, such as biotechnology, for years. So them being involved here raises questions.

[–] Saneless@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I want to get rid of it because I want a non sugar coke that doesn't taste like burned tar soaked in urine

[–] Silverseren@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Then drink the Diet Coke with Splenda one? There's also Coke Life that has stevia instead. They basically made sure they have a version with each type of sweetener.

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Splenda is worse... Stevia is fine

[–] poppy@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Stevia tastes just awful to me. I wish I liked it.

[–] Saneless@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not better. Splenda just tastes odd. And I haven't seen that in stores in years, and I don't remember liking it the first time around

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Splenda legit causes digestive problems... Aspartame is fine... Especially in comparison

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] blackluster117@possumpat.io 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dude, Olipop Vintage Cola is next level. That perfect vanilla cola without being too overpowering. I love to have it with a great sandwich and chips or dinner!

[–] PreachHard@mander.xyz 12 points 1 year ago

This reads like an ad straight from the 60s lol

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I like their Cherry Vanilla. It goes right through me, though. The apple cider vinegar they use cleans you out. 🤐

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely... Aspartame is safe

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Aspartame isn't only safe, it also goes GREAT with a cold glass of Coke Zero™! *

*these statements have not been approved by the FDA

[–] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

I especially like the part where they get away scot free, and the guy is just telling us to ignore them… maybe fire them for the conflict of interests? Ugh.