this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
347 points (99.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6037 readers
537 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
347
‘A new phase’: why climate activists are turning to sabotage instead of protest (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 2 days ago by solo@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Tougher laws said to be inspiring clandestine attacks on the ‘property and machinery’ of the fossil fuel economy

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The goal of both is to start reducing or simply stop large scale actions that are doing damage to the environment. If peaceful protesting is being prevented or simply is just being ignored, then the next step is directly stopping things. If it's vandalism or misdirected damage, that's not really accomplishing the goal and can be used against activists and their message.

The caveat is that most changes either through successful protests or more direct measures will harm others at some point, but I fail to see a way around that when we live in a society where everyone is dependent in many ways on the society continuing its destructive path. The longer we wait to change, the worse it will be for more people, and at some point it won't be protesters that cause the change, but the environment or some other factors like demand exceeding supply that cause huge suffering.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 11 points 1 day ago

Vandalism is a crime. Causing economic harm to a business that is causing mass extinction is sabatogue, not a crime.