this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
361 points (99.5% liked)

BuyFromEU

1816 readers
976 users here now

Welcome to BuyFromEU - A community dedicated to supporting European-made goods and services!

We also invite you to subscribe to:

Logo generated with mistral le chat Banner by Christian Lue on unsplash.com

founded 2 weeks ago
MODERATORS
 

For the people who have not yet decided on a search engine. The most EU way you can go is Ecosia or Qwant as they are building their own search index.

Ecosia is my personal pick as its also aimed at planting trees and they have quite a good browser alongside it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

The EU has made numerous moves towards restricting free speech and communication over the last decade, especially in the technology space. These include:

  1. Digital Services Act (DSA) (2022)
  • The DSA imposes strict regulations on large online platforms and search engines (such as Google and Meta).

  • Requires platforms to remove "illegal content" quickly, though the definition of illegal content varies by country.

  • Mandates content moderation transparency but can pressure platforms to suppress speech preemptively.

  • Enables regulators to demand access to platform algorithms and recommend content moderation changes.

  • Forces messaging apps like WhatsApp and Signal to comply with EU orders, potentially compromising end-to-end encryption.

  1. Digital Markets Act (DMA) (2022)
  • Primarily aimed at tech monopolies, but also affects search engines and app stores.

  • Limits the ability of platforms to rank their own services higher (e.g., Google prioritizing its own results).

  • Forces companies like Apple to open up iMessage to other messaging services, potentially impacting security.

  1. Terrorist Content Online Regulation (2021)
  • Requires platforms to remove flagged terrorist content within one hour or face heavy fines.

  • No clear appeals process, raising concerns about automatic censorship by algorithms.

  • Governments can demand removals across all EU member states, limiting national sovereignty over content moderation.

  1. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (2018)
  • Although GDPR focuses on privacy, it has been used to delist certain search results (right to be forgotten).

  • Some critics argue that GDPR can be weaponized to suppress critical information about public figures.

  1. Copyright Directive (2019) – Article 17 (formerly Article 13)
  • Requires platforms to filter copyrighted content before it is uploaded.

  • Forces platforms like YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook to proactively block content using automated filters, which often lead to false positives and excessive censorship.

  • Criticized for making memes and satire more difficult to share due to automated copyright enforcement.

  1. EU Code of Practice on Disinformation (2018, revised 2022)
  • Although voluntary at first, compliance with fact-checking and disinformation policies is now mandatory under the DSA.

  • Forces social media companies to demonetize or downrank "misinformation," often without clear definitions.

  • Involves close cooperation with government-backed fact-checkers, raising concerns about political bias.

  1. Chat Control Legislation (Proposed in 2022)
  • Requires messaging platforms (e.g., WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal) to scan private messages for child abuse content.

  • Critics argue this destroys end-to-end encryption, making all private communication vulnerable.

  • Could lead to mass surveillance under the guise of child protection.

  1. Political Ads Transparency Act (2023)
  • Requires all online political ads to be labeled and traceable.

  • Platforms must track funding sources, but unclear definitions of political content could impact activism and independent journalism.

  • Could be used to limit grassroots campaigns that lack formal funding structures.

  1. Media Freedom Act (2023)
  • Gives the EU more oversight over media ownership and state influence on journalism.

  • Some journalists worry it could be used to pressure media outlets to align with EU narratives.

These are just the laws. There have been uncounted statements by EU leaders about greater control over the kind of information they wish to allow transmitted in the EU. All of these Acts are rooted in good intentions, but the road to hell is paved with good intentions. At minimum, a significant portion of the results in the test list above would be banned under existing legislation.

I can imagine the prompt to generate this:

  1. Make a list of EU regulations that apply to tech giants and explain what they are.
  2. For each of the regulations add one example that oversimplifies the potential downsides
  3. Ommit any advantages

A troll trolling.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 2 points 4 hours ago

Ah yes, because regulations are so horrible, right?

It stands in the way of "innovation".

God forbid we protect our citizens!