There was plenty of evidence that this was the likely outcome of this offensive months before it even started. Why tf did they go ahead with it anyway?

I remember discussing the Russian advantage on reddit back in January, including them building defensive lines and the general imbalance in equipment, especially artillery and ammo, as well as the fact that Russia had caught up in troop numbers by that point. I had western sources for these numbers.

You wouldn't believe the level of hate and name-calling I received for pointing this out and saying they should negotiate. But apparently I was the one spewing propaganda.

[–] PilferJynx@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Negotiate surrender to a serial invader? I agree that Ukrainians are in poor position but allowing Russia to keep taking more land isn't healthy for world stability.

[–] renohren@partizle.com -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Russia or China having to only look after itself, it's population, it's secessionist regions was much better for the colllective west. The current goal is to have them do that again. Even if it means manufacturing an economic crisis the west will suffer from too, it's still better that getting our collective ass kicked out of african or southeast asian countries. And if someone must get through suffering, it might as well be Ukrainians rather than germans or poles, so just enough material to have a stable front.

Not my thought but pretty sure it's the one coming up in confidential assessments, and I can't totally fault them if you take out the humanity from considerations.

[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A negotiated settlement is not surrender. This war is not good for world stability clearly, if it stopped that would be good, no?

You're arguing from a position of "this should not be and therefore cannot be". But it clearly can. You're in denial.

[–] PilferJynx@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What does settlement look like? Ukraine to surrender it's occupied land? I'm actually curious what you have in mind.

[–] imgprojts@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

It starts with all ruzzians back in ruzzia out of occupied Ukraine...then putin's balls deep fried on a platter and putin has to eat them.

[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago

I mean at this point it doesn't look like Russia wants to give anything back, but who knows. They need to start with a ceasefire and maybe over time they can figure out the rest.

They should have taken the deal from April last year, where Russia had reportedly agreed to go back to the pre-Feb-22 borders. And before that, they should have implemented Minsk actually. The most important things Russia wanted was for Ukraine to be neutral, and to stop attacking the Donbas.

Ukraine's negotiating position just keeps getting worse.

[–] MJBrune@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think Ukraine alone can beat Russia back either but I also don't think they should negotiate. Negotiation would only be a huge win for Russia. If they gain any ground they'll see it simply as the price of the land and invade again once they saved enough to pay again.

Honestly, the best bet would be for Ukraine to gain an active ally. Someone who can put boots on the ground and push Russia back. The US could obviously steam roll Russia back but if that happened it'd be likely Russia would trigger a larger war.

[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

You want to send even more conscripts into these defense lines while risking some other country getting bombed? You do realize that this will not magically fix the artillery and ammo shortage, and that Russia can mobilize even more troops as well?

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"the best bet would be for" ... "a larger war" ?

🤦

[–] MJBrune@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

So what, you are in favor of Ukraine just surrendering?

[–] baru@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You wouldn't believe the level of hate and name-calling I received for pointing this out and saying they should negotiate.

This has been going on since 2014. Since last year Russia stepped up with genocide. I think it's not so nice you're pretending you were downvoted for two things, while ignoring that negotiation is pretty stupid. Look in the past, Russia often though messed up their initial attack only then to finally become wiser after regrouping.

[–] diffuselight@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He’s a tankie, he keeps telling tales about poor Russia being forced into war and that we should make peace with them. Just ignore the white noise, typical German cosplay tankie.

[–] WallK@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Let's negotiate you sending third of your possessions and I will pinky promise not to take more

[–] Blastasaurus@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I read/heard an interesting conspiracy theory the other day: The west didn't want to fully topple the Putin regime in case the power vacuum brought out something worse (Prighozin and his Nazi's armed with nukes).

Perhaps they held back just to grind down the Russian army at the expense of the UA.

[–] MJBrune@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

I think the US is pretty open about that. They don't want Ukraine to attack Russia, just defend themselves.