this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
1591 points (99.7% liked)

Science Memes

13931 readers
1718 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 17 points 5 days ago (4 children)

People shit on Hossenfelder but she has a point. Academia partially brought this on themselves.

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

People shit in Hossenfelder much more for her non-academic takes.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Her video on trans issues has made it very difficult to take her seriously as a thinker. The same types of manipulative half truths and tropes I see from TERFs pretending they have the “reasonable” view, while also spreading the hysteric media narrative about the kids getting transed.

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

I didn't even see that. Just a few clips of her rants about other things she confidently knows nothing about, like a less incoherent Jordan Peterson.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 4 days ago

People shit on Hossenfelder but she has a point. Academia partially brought this on themselves.

Somehow I briefly got her and Pluckrose reversed in my mind, and was still kinda nodding along.

If you don't know who I mean, Pluckrose and two others produced a bunch of hoax papers (likening themselves to the Sokal affair) of which 4 were published and 3 were accepted but hadn't been published, 4 were told to revise and resubmit and one was under review at the point they were revealed. 9 were rejected, a bit less than half the total (which included both the papers on autoethnography). The idea was to float papers that were either absurd or kinda horrible like a study supporting reducing homophobia and transphobia in straight cis men by pegging them (was published in Sexuality & Culture) or one that was just a rewrite of a section of Mein Kampf as a feminist text (was accepted by Affilia but not yet published when the hoax was revealed).

My personal favorite of the accepted papers was "When the Joke Is on You: A Feminist Perspective on How Positionality Influences Satire" just because of how ballsy it is to spell out what you are doing so obviously in the title. It was accepted by Hypatia but hadn't been published yet when the hoax was revealed.

Hossenfelder is fine but tries to educate way outside her realm. Her cryptocurrency episode made me lose all respect for her.