this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
652 points (93.7% liked)

Funny

8730 readers
2783 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I cannot tell that this is AI. I thought it was a human's work. I don't believe this is AI. If this is AI, then I have to admit that AI is better than I thought -- not sure why you'd say it's useless.

[–] Monstrosity@lemm.ee 23 points 4 days ago (3 children)

This is absolutely AI generated, friend.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 8 points 4 days ago (6 children)
[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I can't recall memes being hand drawn in Ghibli style until they made Ghibli style AI reproducible a couple of days ago. So let's just say that the probability of a lot of memes using Ghibli style art going forward is probably close to 99.9% certain of being AI generated.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You're almost certainly right, but there's nothing in the image that gives it away as obviously AI, is there?

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not that I can see, no. I'm just saying: "New AI slop dropped, prepare to get flooded"

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

Yep. Hopefully this trend burns itself out pretty quickly.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I know it because it's a copy of a comic I saw about a decade ago that I know for a fact was not styled like this

Edit: finally got more than the preview to load and I can now see that this is a riff not a rip Edit2: original comic

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

I realise it's referencing another comic, but based on just the art alone, it's hard to tell, isn't it?

[–] BearGun@ttrpg.network 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If you zoom in there's a number of tells. Just to name a few, The man's right hand thumb, the ends of the sticks, the bottom girls hands, the fusing of the boy's hands, the boy's left leg. Just gotta look close and think.

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago

Looking at the background also tends to help. If you look at the city, it looks realistic at first. But once you zoom in, it makes a lot less sense.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

If it was an actual artist rather than someone typing a prompt into an AI, they would have known that it's "Studio Ghibli" not "Ghibli Studio"....

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I also can't. If people believe that other normal people can tell the difference they are surely mistaken. From the comments supposedly you have to know how to detect some micro flaws and zoom a lot already knowing where to look.

The future is not good.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

It still can't do hands for shit except for things it has a lot of data for, and still has that "AI shine" and artifacting but somewhat filtered.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Downvoting not because I disagree with you, but because you provide no evidence.

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Sure, let me believe you, a random person on the internet. In all seriousness, I could believe either way, but you just saying that without any explanation is pretty useless.

[–] Monstrosity@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It has to do with the "flatness" of the general composition. It reeks of AI. A human usually needs to intervene to prevent that.

Are you happy now?

[–] Chocobofangirl@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Also there's a weird rectangle in the guy's hands that doesn't match the scene (paper? dollar bill?), the rolled up thing in the ledft corner is clearly a bastardization of a soda bottle and a rolled-up newspaper, and there's some weird white chunk on the middle girl's forehead that feels like it's supposed to be a physical colouring error.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago

The rectangle is just the gap between his arm and body, isn't it?

The other stuff is odd, but not a smoking gun by any means.

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yep, though the link and explanation of the recent trends also helped a lot. I just just taking a pot shot at at the general "just trust me bro" vibe, but I probably went a bit too mean at the end there.

[–] Monstrosity@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You weren't mean at all. I'm a snarky, cranky fuck sometimes, it's not on you lol.

[–] myrak@lemmy.world -5 points 4 days ago (3 children)

No human in their right mind would put a well kempt dude in a suit into a post apocalyptic comic. It just doesn't make sense.

[–] YungOnions@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

But it's literally based off of a cartoon with a man in a suit, though: https://www.insidehook.com/culture/story-tom-toro-new-yorker-climate-cartoon

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 days ago

This was actually my favourite detail though. It gives the apocalypse this sense of immediacy which I think is important for the message it's trying to tell.

[–] Monstrosity@lemm.ee -2 points 4 days ago

I don't know why you're getting boo'd, you're right!