this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
707 points (97.7% liked)

Funny

9209 readers
1427 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If typing a prompt into a plagiarism machine makes you an artist, why doesn’t paying a real human to make art for you also make you an artist?

If someone said they were the artist of something but it turns out they just paid someone else to do it, would you think they were a talentless jackass or an artist?

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They weren't calling themselves artists, they were saying the AI/model is the artist.

Your comparison is a strawman.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Art is made by artists, who are human, and your argument is the fallacy fallacy.

[–] FourWaveforms@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The artist is the neural network

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The plagiarism machine vomits out the visual equivalent of text prediction. It isn’t an artist any more than the text prediction on your phone is an author if you hit the next predicted word enough times, people are artists and authors. Image generation is at best a Xerox machine.

[–] FourWaveforms@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah well that's just like, your opinion, man.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, it’s based on knowing the difference between a tool and a human being 👍

[–] FourWaveforms@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

I know plenty of human beings who are tools

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

And why is that different from a human? Explain in physical, measurable terms.

Give we don't know how our own brains work, I don't think you can.

And if you cannot, you have to use the things that are measurable, which are external.

If I were asked by a person to draw me a fluffy trex, first thing I'm gonna do is go look at pictures of trex and pictures of other dinos with feathers, maybe some fluffy birds.

And then I'm gonna plagiarize, because art is theft.

Tdlr: get off your high horse

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Bro, it’s not a person and it doesn’t think. This is embarrassing for you. This is like thinking there are little people in the TV.

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 0 points 2 weeks ago
[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm talking about the machine being the artist, reread my message.

Nvmd other guy got it