6
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
6 points (80.0% liked)
Psychology
450 readers
1 users here now
A place for articles, discussions and questions about psychology – the science of mind and behavior. It is a multidisciplinary field, covering behavioral, cognitive, developmental, educational, neuro-biological, personality, and social studies (and more!).
Rules:
- Do not take or give direct medical advice in your posts or comments.
- Absolutely no bigotry, hate speech or discrimination. That includes (but is not limited to) ableism, antisemitism, islamophobia, queer*- and LGBTQIA*-phobia, racism, and sexism.
- Keep discussions in good faith and be respectful.
- Posts should be related to academic, applied or clinical psychology in some way.
- Titles should be relevant to the content and not misleading.
- Do not post links to your own surveys, spam or self-help tips/videos.
Friends and related communities:
- !artificial_intel
- !biology
- !linguistics
- !medicine
- !mentalhealth
- !neuroscience
- !openscience
- !publichealth@baraza.africa
- !science
- !statistics
Banner: "A cross section of a mouse brain stained with cortical layer specific proteins" by Mamunur Rashid, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons / height edited to fit as banner
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
We don’t use those terms any more in cognitive psychology… are there other branches of psychology that do?
Ok, but are they such useless concepts or defined in such a specific way that they have no equivalent in cognitive psychology? What were these categories superseded by in cognitive psychology?
I find them a useful shorthand in certain contexts when there is a tension between what one's instincts push you to do, what evaluated to be possible and what you judge that should be in an ideal world.
I just wanted to get an idea of how this manifests in crowds and societies, how individuals and advertising agencies can manipulate the "collective subconscious" (another concept that you may find obsolete, but is very useful when you analyze recurring characters in storytelling or aspects of aesthetics) and how those groups of people are aware of what is happening to them and judge the situation.
I don’t think there are equivalents. We know that certain parts of the brain house, or are associated with, ways of thinking. The closest I can think of would be the PFC as equivalent to ego. But no, neither Freudian nor Jungian psychology are useful beyond certain English departments using Freud and/or Jung as a form of critical literary analysis (literary theory). It’s like how the Bohr model of the atom is still taught in schools even though it’s incredibly primitive, and physics has long moved past it.
Eh, the Bohr model actually gets some things roughly right (line spectra in Hydrogen-like atoms), but that is only because it was good enough to happen to fit those specific data :) but ok, maybe instead of Freudian terms, I should use a more modern system like Schwartz's Internal Family Systems and try to extrapolate that: e.g. subpersonalities would become subcultures